Hostile Takeover Bids: Defensive Strategies
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Share Tendering Strategies and the Success of Hostile Takeover Bids
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive...
متن کاملHedge Fund Activism vs. Hostile Takeover Bids⇤
We compare hedge fund activism and hostile tender offers in a unified framework where any investor who acquires an equity stake to improve firm value faces a dual free-rider problem: Neither do dispersed shareholders sell their shares unless the price fully reflects the anticipated value improvement nor do those who retain their shares participate in the costs. We show that activism and tender ...
متن کاملHostile Takeover Bids In Japan? Understanding Convergence Using The Layered Approach
Hostile takeover bids arrived in Japan in 2005 and U.S. legal scholars announced that their arrival offered strong evidence in support of corporate governance convergence to the U.S. shareholder-oriented model. Now, four years later, there has still not been a successful hostile takeover bid and the practice has seemingly fallen out of favor. The Japanese experience with hostile takeover bids s...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Alberta Law Review
سال: 2000
ISSN: 1925-8356,0002-4821
DOI: 10.29173/alr517